Disputed Whether accepting some AI harms is justified by broad access and benefits
Altman argued that society should accept some harms in exchange for AI’s benefits and broad public access.
Sources (2)
“We believe that the world should accept some bad things happening for the benefits of this technology and people having the agency”
“One of the differences between us and some of the stricter AI safety people is that we believe that the world should accept some bad things happening for the benefits of this…”
Marcus said Altman’s position implied the public should bear harms so technology executives could become richer and more powerful.
Sources (1)
“…saying the quiet part out loud: suck it up, so you can make us rich and powerful”
